Trial Transcripts Detail
School's Knowledge of Teacher's Abuses
Principal Admits To Shredding All
Testimony about Abuses, then quits
Paul Hassler, a math teacher in Montgomery County Maryland, sued a
parent and tutor to many of his students and athletes, after she wrote a letter of concern
at the instruction of the principal, John Nori. As ABC-TV's 20/20 was setting up in
the courtroom to cover Hassler's own testimony, and witnesses gathered to testify against
him, Paul Hassler told the judge he was afraid to be cross-examined, and wanted to
quit.
This is the fourth loss by Hassler in legal battles he's waged
since his abuses against county students were exposed in 1997.
The trial did not go well for Paul Hassler. After being torn apart
by his own witnesses in the first hours of the trial, in which the full history of
his violations and abuses was outlined for the jury, Paul Hassler claimed his heart
condition wouldn't let him continue, and he wanted to quit his lawsuit.
The principal, John Nori testified to longstanding knowledge of
Hassler's abuses, to shredding all student testimony in his investigation, and to lying to
superiors. He quit his position suddenly in June.
Unable to garner more than one student to support him, Paul
Hassler told the judge that he wanted to quit his year-long lawsuit. The judge instructed
Hassler that he could not file the suit again, even insisting that Hassler indicate his
acceptance of this aloud, before the court. The judge also decreed that Hassler was
required to pay all costs.
Hassler's panic is also evident in the transcripts of
his deposition, in which he is questioned in detail about specific abuses against
students.
Courtroom Discoveries: MCPS - "We Knew"
The testimony from Nori and Seleznow shocked the courtroom. Nori testified
that MCPS officials knew of Hassler's abuses against students for many years.
Court documents also revealed that Dr. Seleznow and the Board of Education knew
of Nori's failure to investigate back in Feburary, 1998, but reappointed Hassler as coach
and continued to ignore his abuses in the classroom.
Steven Seleznow has quit his job with the school system.
Parent Outrage
"Aside for his slurs and his temper, he clearly is not qualified for the
job," a Magruder parent commented. "He doesn't know the math. Look
at his transcript. My daughter had to repeat the course he taught her when she got
to college - and she'd gotten an A from him."
"Not with my child, they won't," another parent remarked.
"We've already made it clear to them: no Hassler."
As parents examine the performance of his students, and his own preformance in
the classroom, the pressures on Hassler to quit continue to mount.
Bombshells at the Trial: Hassler's 27 year history
Principal Nori was Hassler's first witness. His testimony revealed that
another letter had been written, by another parent requesting Hassler's removal from
another coaching position. He also disclosed that he had received many more
complaints from parents afraid to "go on the record" lest Hassler turn his
torment on their child. Other letters and repeated reprimands were discovered in Paul
Hassler's personnel file, going back 27 years.
In one example of the incidents recorded in his personnel file, Hassler received
a formal letter of professional misconduct in office, in 1976, which reprimanded him for
losing control in a rage in which he physically attacked a student, and for telling
students, as justification, that he had served in Vietnam when he had never even been in
the military. His 27 year file shows repeated incidents of losing control verbally and
physically, with repeated warnings of "stronger measures" should they
continue. Yet the file makes clear that despite repeated violations, no stronger
measures were ever taken. Associate Supterintendent Seleznow,
in his deposition, refused to answer why this was so. In an earlier meeting he
explained, "Mr. Hassler is active in the union."
High Failure Rate Disclosed
Hassler's own college transcript shows he received 18 D's and F's while
attending a community college during three separate enrollments over an 8 year period,
many in the math he now teaches.
Complaints in his file also revealed that students in his classes performed
significantly worse than students from other teachers on the county-wide final
exams. A report in Hassler's personnel file revealed that 75% of Hassler's
Algebra II students received D's or E's on the county final exam. In his deposition, Hassler stated that such low grades on the
county exam "didn't really matter" Students testifying reported that
Hassler's artificially high grading curve masks his failure to teach. "A 65% score
will still get you an 'A'. He doesn't teach, and we try to get transferred to
another teacher, but the counselor tells us we have to stick it out," an honor
student reports. "I got an 'A' in Pre-Calculus both semesters in his class, and
when I took the same course in college, I got a 'D.' This is wrong. My counselor
told me they know he doesn't teach, but there's nothing they can do about it."
Students Asked to Lie
One of the many issues in the case was Hassler's instruction to the girls on his
softball team to lie about their participation in his illegal clinic. Nori admitted
under oath that he did not investigate this charge either, yet told his superiors that he
had. Testimony from ten girls revealed that each was asked to lie, and had told Mr.
Nori this during his investigation.
In a suprising disclosure, it was learned that Steven Seleznow, and all members
of the Board of Education knew of Nori's failure to investigate, back in February of 1998,
but took no action.
John Nori then shredded the entire file, with all
testimony from students, staff, and parents.
A Strong Union
"There is one person missing in this courtroom," the
trial began. "One person who should be here to listen to this testimony. And
that is Jerry Weast, the new Superintendent of Montgomery County Public
Schools."
As the facts came to light, the picture emerged of a school system
bogged down by bureaucracy and protections for its staff, but without similar protections
for children.
"If they can't do anything to remove an abusive and
incompetent teacher, fine. Admit that. Just tell us," a parent said.
"But to tell us 'we care' and 'we can' and 'we want to hear from you' and then leave
a parent hanging out there alone to fight the nightmare of a million dollar lawsuit, for
following the exact steps they ask us to follow...this is wrong."
Jumping Ship
Twice in the 15 months of his lawsuit, Paul Hassler was required to testify
under oath. Each time he claimed the physical stress of taking the oath was too
great. And each time, he was back at work immediately after claiming his health
wouldn't permit him to testify.
The community was outraged at Hassler's refusal to take the stand. Students and
families had been dragged into Hassler's lawsuit, a nightmare not only for a single mother
and her daughter, who was Student Government President, and Captain of the It's Academic
team - but for the high school community at large. Hundreds of students were
required to come forward to testify.
"The man brings a lawsuit against a parent who wrote a letter of concern,
he involves the whole community, forces 17 and 18 year-old kids to testify at a trial, and
then jumps his own ship because he lacks the courage to take the
stand?" a courtroom observer commented. "It sure raises the ugly picture
that the lawsuit itself was nothing more than a retaliation that he never took seriously.
He abused not just these kids and this family, but the legal process itself."
All evidence obtained regarding Paul Hassler's abuses of students, and the
administrators' destruction of evidence has been turned over to State's Attorney's Office
in Montgomery County, Maryland. |